Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI
- 18 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 44 (6) , 1673-1682
Abstract
Purpose To test the feasibility and effectiveness of using maximum intensity plots (MIPs) based on 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) velocity data to assess systolic peak velocities in a cohort of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. Materials and Methods 4D flow MRI at 1.5T was performed on 51 BAV patients. MIPs were generated from the 4D flow MRI velocity data and used by two users to determine peak velocities in three regions of interest (ROIs): ascending aorta (AAo), aortic arch, and descending aorta. 4D flow MRI peak velocities in the AAo were compared to peak velocities recorded by 2D phase contrast MRI (2D PCMRI) in a subcohort of 36 patients and by Doppler echocardiography in a subcohort of 34 patients. 4D flow MRI peak velocities recorded by each observer were compared for all ROIs to test for interobserver variability. Results 4D flow MRI recorded significantly higher velocities compared to 2D PCMRI (2.04 ± 0.71 m/s vs. 1.69 ± 0.79 m/s, 17.2% difference, P < 0.001) and similar velocities compared to Doppler echocardiography. There was excellent agreement between the observers, with a mean difference of 0.005 m/s and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. Conclusion 4D flow MRI velocity MIPs allow for efficient measurement of peak velocities in BAV patients with higher accuracy than 2D PCMRI and similar accuracy to Doppler echocardiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1673–1682.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HL115828, K25HL119608)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- k‐t GRAPPA accelerated four‐dimensional flow MRI in the aorta: Effect on scan time, image quality, and quantification of flow and wall shear stressMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2013
- Four‐dimensional velocity‐encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flowJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2012
- Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Not Simply a Degenerative ProcessCirculation, 2011
- Clinical outcomes in non-surgically managed patients with very severe versus severe aortic stenosisHeart, 2011
- Flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: A validation studyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- The effects of breath-holding on pulmonary regurgitation measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mappingJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2009
- The Bicuspid Aortic ValveCirculation, 2005
- Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve StenosisCirculation, 2003
- Time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: Quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mappingAmerican Heart Journal, 1993