Construction and empirical testing of comprehensive risk evaluation methods from a multi-dimensional risk matrix perspective: taking specific types of natural disasters risk in China as an example
Authors:
- 17 March 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 117 (2) , 1245-1271
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- National Social Science Fund of China (No.19AZD019)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974182)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research on flood risk analysis and evaluation method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusionSafety Science, 2012
- Evaluation of effect of coal chemical properties on coal swelling index using artificial neural networksExpert Systems with Applications, 2011
- VulnerabilityGlobal Environmental Change, 2006
- Quantitative flood risk assessment for PoldersReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005
- National-scale Assessment of Current and Future Flood Risk in England and WalesNatural Hazards, 2005
- Uncertainty in adaptive capacityComptes Rendus. Géoscience, 2005
- Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South CarolinaAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 2000
- Reframing disaster policy: the global evolution of vulnerable communitiesGlobal Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 1999
- Assessment of earthquake hazard in the Tokyo area, JapanTectonophysics, 1991
- Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued MappingThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967