Abstract
Summary: Aim : To evaluate whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents peptic ulcer in non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug users by means of a meta‐analysis.Material and methods : A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the AGA congress. Randomized trials comparing H. pylori eradication vs. non‐eradication or eradication vs. a proton pump inhibitor in patients receiving a non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug were selected.Results : Five studies and 939 patients were included in the analysis; 34 of 459 (7.4%) patients developed a peptic ulcer in the eradicated group vs. 64 of 480 (13.3%) in the control group. The odds ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.20–0.93). Sub‐analyses showed a significant reduction of risk for non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐naive (odds ratio = 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.14–0.49) but not for previously treated patients (odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–1.72). Two studies with a total of 385 patients compared eradication vs. a proton pump inhibitor; five of 196 (2.6%) developed a peptic ulcer in the eradicated group vs. zero of 189 (0%) in the proton pump inhibitor group (odds ratio = 7.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.27–43.6).Conclusion : Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the incidence of peptic ulcer in the overall population receiving non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. It appears to be especially effective when performed in non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐naïve patients. Nonetheless, eradication seems less effective than treatment with a maintenance proton pump inhibitor for preventing non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐associated ulcers.

This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit: