The Blue List Initiative: Guiding Biodiversity Restoration in Brazil's Espinhaço Range
Authors:
- Daniel NegreirosDNDaniel Negreiros
- Tiago S. P. TomaTTTiago S. P. Toma
- Abel A. ConceiçãoACAbel A. Conceição
- Izabella D. R. SilvaISIzabella D. R. Silva
- Vitória R. SantosVSVitória R. Santos
- Cássio C. PereiraCPCássio C. Pereira
- Israel M. PereiraIPIsrael M. Pereira
- Geraldo Wilson FernandesGFGeraldo Wilson Fernandes
Open Access
- 17 April 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Applied Vegetation Science
- Vol. 29 (2) , e70073
Abstract
Questions: How can a reference framework be developed for the ecological restoration of the campo rupestre, a biodiverse Brazilian ecosystem? Specifically, what are the challenges posed by habitat heterogeneity and species turnover in the mountain range, and how can they be addressed to create ‘Blue Lists’, defined as habitat‐ and ecosystem‐specific reference species lists that guide assisted ecological restoration? Location: The campo rupestre ecosystem of Brazil's Espinhaço Mountain Range spans a strong latitudinal and altitudinal gradient of nearly 10 degrees, extending from the Southern Espinhaço in Minas Gerais to the Chapada Diamantina in Bahia. Methods: Phytosociological data from 20 studies and 101 species lists were analysed. Species were classified by substrate (quartzite and ferruginous) and habitat types, further divided into herbaceous and woody strata. A cluster analysis using Sørensen distance identified floristic clusters, while zeta diversity analyses evaluated species turnover at species, genus, and family levels. Phylogenetic and spatial signals were assessed to examine species co‐occurrence patterns. Results: A total of 1,126 plant species were identified, exhibiting significant compositional variation between substrates and habitat types. Floristic clusters demonstrated high species turnover, with few species shared across habitats. Phylogenetic analysis revealed convergent evolutionary patterns, and spatial analysis showed significant geographic clustering of species composition. Conclusions: Restoration efforts must account for habitat heterogeneity and substrate‐specific species compositions to prevent biotic homogenization and enhance ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. Detailed Blue Lists, defined as habitat‐specific target species lists, are critical for effective ecological restoration. Future studies should prioritize closing knowledge gaps, especially in understudied regions of the campo rupestre.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (442499/2023‐0)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (406757/2022‐4)
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring continuous compositional change using decline and decay in zeta diversityEcology, 2019
- The deadly route to collapse and the uncertain fate of Brazilian rupestrian grasslandsBiodiversity and Conservation, 2018
- The Megadiverse Rupestrian Grassland2016
- Rupestrian Grassland Vegetation, Diversity, and Origin2016
- Challenges in the Restoration of Quartzitic and Ironstone Rupestrian Grasslands2016
- Soils Associated with Rupestrian Grasslands2016
- The Shady Future of the Rupestrian Grassland: Major Threats to Conservation and Challenges in the Anthropocene2016
- Ecology and Conservation of Mountaintop grasslands in Brazil2016
- A Monte Carlo Study of Thirty Internal Criterion Measures for Cluster AnalysisPsychometrika, 1981
- An Examination of the Effect of Six Types of Error Perturbation on Fifteen Clustering AlgorithmsPsychometrika, 1980