Behavioral responses by an apex predator to urbanization
Open Access
- 2 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Behavioral Ecology
- Vol. 30 (3) , 821-829
Abstract
Wildlife can respond to urbanization positively (synanthropic) or negatively (misanthropic), and for some species, this is a nonlinear process, whereby low levels of urbanization elicit a positive response, but this response becomes negative at high levels of urbanization. We applied concepts from foraging theory to predict positive and negative behavioral responses of coyotes (Canis latrans) along an urbanization gradient in the Chicago metropolitan area, USA. We estimated home range size and complexity, and metrics of 3 movement behaviors (encamped, foraging, and traveling) using Hidden Markov movement models. We found coyotes exhibited negative behavioral responses to highly urbanized landscapes: coyotes viewed the landscape as lower quality, riskier, and more fragmented (home range size and complexity, and time spent encamped increased). Conversely, we found evidence of both positive and negative responses to suburban landscapes: coyotes not only viewed the landscape as higher quality than natural fragments and equally risky, but also viewed it as fragmented (home range size decreased, time spent encamped did not change, and home range complexity increased). Although the spatial and behavioral responses of coyotes to urbanization became increasingly negative as urbanization increased, coyotes were still able to occupy highly urbanized landscapes. Our study demonstrates how wildlife behavioral responses can be dependent on the degree of urbanization and represents one of the first descriptions of apex predator space use and movement in a highly urbanized landscape.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cook County Animal and Rabies Control
- Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation
- Forest Preserve District of Cook County
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon poolsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land ExpansionPLOS ONE, 2011
- Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in researchJournal of Mammalogy, 2011
- Coyote Habitat Selection and Management Implications for the Gaspésie CaribouThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2010
- The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservationBiological Conservation, 2008
- LoCoH: Nonparameteric Kernel Methods for Constructing Home Ranges and Utilization DistributionsPLOS ONE, 2007
- The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animalsEcological Modelling, 2006
- Home Range, Habitat Use, and Nocturnal Activity of Coyotes in an Urban EnvironmentThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2001
- Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical ReviewAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1984
- On Optimal Use of a Patchy EnvironmentThe American Naturalist, 1966