Evaluation of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Therapy in the Murine Hindlimb Lymphedema Model
Authors:
- Shahnur AhmedShahnur Ahmed
- Ganesh MohanGMGanesh Mohan
- Daniel J. KonigDKDaniel J. Konig
- Christopher A. Subi-KasoziCSChristopher A. Subi-Kasozi
- Steven SullivanSSSteven Sullivan
- Angad S. SidhuASAngad S. Sidhu
- Miguel D. JorgeMJMiguel D. Jorge
- Helen C. SinexHSHelen C. Sinex
- Marc S. MendoncaMMMarc S. Mendonca
- Arin K. GreeneAGArin K. Greene
- Mithun SinhaMithun Sinha
- Aladdin H. HassaneinAHAladdin H. Hassanein
- 30 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Journal of Vascular Research
- p. 1
Abstract
Introduction: Lymphedema is limb swelling secondary to lymphatic injury. Utilization of negative pressure therapy (NPT) has been shown to stimulate lymphatic vessel density, but the effect of NPT on secondary lymphedema is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of prophylactic NPT in murine hindlimb lymphedema model. Methods: The murine hindlimb model of lymphedema was used. Mice underwent 20-Gy irradiation of one hindlimb. One-week post-radiation, an incision in the proximal hindlimb was created to disrupt lymphatic vessels and remove popliteal lymph nodes. Mice were divided into two groups: group 1 (NPT) and group 2 (no NPT). Group 1 received a negative pressure of 75 mm Hg on the lymphedema-induced hindlimb for 12 consecutive hours in the first 5 postoperative days (PODs). Group 2 did not receive NPT. Paw thickness measurements and near-infrared laser lymphangiography were measured. Results: The study included 16 mice (group 1 n = 6, group 2 n = 10). Paw thickness on POD 21 in group 1 was 2.9 ± 0.3 mm compared to 3.3 ± 0.3 mm in group 2 (p = 0.02). On POD 35, the average paw thickness was 2.4 ± 0.1 mm in group 1 compared to 3.2 ± 0.2 mm (p = 0.001). Lymphangiography dye clearance was greater in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Mice in the hindlimb lymphedema model that underwent NPT in the early postoperative period had less paw thickness swelling and better lymphatic function than mice that did not have NPT. NPT decreased lymphedema when used prophylactically following lymphatic injury.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Access to Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: An Evaluation of the National Trend in 60,451 PatientsMicrosurgery, 2025
- Surgical Management of Lymphedema: Prophylactic and Therapeutic OperationsCurrent Breast Cancer Reports, 2024
- Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closureCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022
- ICG lymphographic findings following immediate lymphatic reconstruction in breast cancer patientsJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2022
- Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Simple and Safe Option for LymphedemaJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2020
- Immediate lymphatic reconstructionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2018
- Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk groin wounds in lower extremity revascularizationJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2017
- Optimizing perioperative lymphatic‐venous anastomosis localization using transcutaneous vein illumination, isosulfan blue, and indocyanine green lymphangiographyMicrosurgery, 2017
- Postoperative negative pressure therapy significantly reduces flap complications in distally based peroneus brevis flaps: Experiences from 74 casesInjury, 2016
- Assessing safety of negative-pressure wound therapy over pedicled muscle flaps: A retrospective review of gastrocnemius muscle flapJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2016