Endogenous Political Institutions
Authors:
- Philippe AghionPAPhilippe Aghion
- Alberto AlesinaAAAlberto Alesina
- Francesco TrebbiFTFrancesco Trebbi
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 119 (2) , 565-611
Abstract
A fundamental aspect of institutional design is how much society chooses to delegate unchecked power to its leaders. If, once elected, a leader cannot be restrained, society runs the risk of a tyranny of the majority, if not the tyranny of a dictator. If a leader faces too many ex post checks and balances, legislative action is too often blocked. As our critical constitutional choice, we focus upon the size of the minority needed to block legislation, or conversely the size of the (super)majority needed to govern. We analyze both “optimal” constitutional design and “positive” aspects of this process. We derive several empirical implications which we then discuss.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Democracies Have Different Public Policies than Nondemocracies?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004
- The institutional environment for infrastructure investmentIndustrial and Corporate Change, 2002
- Special Interest PoliticsJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2002
- Self-Selective Social Choice Functions Verify Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite TheoremsEconometrica, 2000
- Democracies Pay Higher WagesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- The quality of governmentThe Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999
- Democracy and growthJournal of Economic Growth, 1996
- Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy1995
- Presidents and Assemblies1992
- The Calculus of Consent1960