Model Checking CTL is Almost Always Inherently Sequential
Open Access
- 17 May 2011
- journal article
- Published by Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe (CCSD) in Logical Methods in Computer Science
- Vol. ume 7, Iss
Abstract
The model checking problem for CTL is known to be P-complete (Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla (1986), see Schnoebelen (2002)). We consider fragments of CTL obtained by restricting the use of temporal modalities or the use of negations---restrictions already studied for LTL by Sistla and Clarke (1985) and Markey (2004). For all these fragments, except for the trivial case without any temporal operator, we systematically prove model checking to be either inherently sequential (P-complete) or very efficiently parallelizable (LOGCFL-complete). For most fragments, however, model checking for CTL is already P-complete. Hence our results indicate that, in cases where the combined complexity is of relevance, approaching CTL model checking by parallelism cannot be expected to result in any significant speedup. We also completely determine the complexity of the model checking problem for all fragments of the extensions ECTL, CTL+, and ECTL+.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model Checking CTL is Almost Always Inherently Sequential2009
- The Tractability of Model-checking for LTL: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly FragmentsElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2009
- LTL Path Checking Is Efficiently Parallelizable2009
- An automata-theoretic approach to branching-time model checking (Extended abstract)1994
- Modalities for model checking: branching time logic strikes backScience of Computer Programming, 1987
- The Boolean formula value problem is in ALOGTIME1987
- Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specificationsACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1986
- “Sometimes” and “not never” revisitedJournal of the ACM, 1986
- Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching timeJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 1985
- Using branching time temporal logic to synthesize synchronization skeletonsScience of Computer Programming, 1982