A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery
Authors:
- Ashley BlomABAshley Blom
- A TaylorATA Taylor
- Evert SmithESEvert Smith
- Ian LearmonthILIan Learmonth
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 18 (5) , 638-642
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and Intraoperative Validity of Preoperative Assessment of Standardized Plain Radiographs in Predicting Bone Loss at Revision Hip SurgeryJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2001
- Classification and Reconstruction in Revision Acetabular Arthroplasty With Bone Stock DeficiencyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hipsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994
- Revision Arthroplasty of the Proximal Femur Using Allograft BoneOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1993
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990
- Joint replacement for ankylosed hips.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990
- Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statisticAPMIS, 1989
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataBiometrics, 1977