A comparison of hand-tracing and cephalometric analysis computer programs with and without advanced features—accuracy and time demands
Authors:
- Georgios TsorovasGTGeorgios Tsorovas
- Agneta Linder-Aronson KarstenAKAgneta Linder-Aronson Karsten
Open Access
- 16 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 32 (6) , 721-728
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the basic and advanced features of five different cephalometric analysis computer programs. The level of measurement agreement with hand-tracing and time demands was examined. The material consisted of 30 digital lateral radiographic images. Twenty-three measurements were calculated by one operator both manually and using five different cephalometric analysis software programs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to detect differences in measurement agreement between hand-tracing and basic features as well as between hand-tracing and advanced features. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to assess intra-user error and a Student’s t-test to determine time differences.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich techniqueAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006
- Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarksAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000
- Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor techniqueEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1998
- Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarksAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports MedicineSports Medicine, 1998
- Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.British Journal of Orthodontics, 1997
- Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalogramsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1993
- Digital image processing techniques for cephalometric analysisComputers in Biology and Medicine, 1991
- Digital Image Processing of Cephalometric Radiographs: A Preliminary ReportBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1985
- The Clinical Significance of Tracing Error in CephalometryBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1974