Quantifying Interpolation Errors in Urban Airborne Laser Scanning Models
- 18 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geographical Analysis
- Vol. 37 (2) , 200-224
Abstract
Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is becoming an increasingly popular data capture technique for a variety of applications in urban surface modeling. Raw ALS data are captured and supplied as a 3D point cloud. Many applications require that these data are interpolated onto a regular grid in order that they may be processed. In this article, we identify and analyze the magnitudes and spatial patterning of residuals from ALS models of urban surfaces, at a range of different scales. Previous research has demonstrated the effects of interpolation method and scale upon the nature of error in digital surface models (DSMs), but the size and spatial patterning of such errors have not hitherto been investigated for urban surfaces. The contribution of this analysis is thus to investigate the ways in which different methods may introduce error, and to understand the uncertainty that characterizes urban surface models that are devised for a wide range of applications. The importance of the research is shown using examples of how the different methods may introduce different amounts of error and how the uncertainty information may benefit users of ALS height models. Our analysis uses a range of validation techniques, including split‐sample, cross‐validation, and jackknifing, to estimate the error created in DSMs of urban areas.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using contour lines to generate digital elevation models for steep slope areas: a case study of the Loess Plateau in North ChinaCATENA, 2003
- Spatial interpolation of soil physical properties for irrigation planning. A simulation study in northern ItalyEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2003
- Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with krigingInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002
- Minimizing the error near discontinuities in boundary element methodEngineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2001
- The accuracy of Digital Elevation Models interpolated to higher resolutionsInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000
- A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample informationEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 1990
- Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pHEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 1987
- Biharmonic spline interpolation of GEOS‐3 and SEASAT altimeter dataGeophysical Research Letters, 1987
- Accuracy of spatial interpolation between point data on soil moisture supply capacity, compared with estimates from mapping unitsGeoderma, 1982
- NOTES ON BIAS IN ESTIMATIONBiometrika, 1956