Outcomes of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in a National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Cancer Center vs. National Cancer Database
Open Access
- 1 October 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Journal of Thoracic Disease
- Vol. 15 (10) , 5349-5361
Abstract
Background: Our study aims to compare outcomes of robotic lobectomy (RL) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCC) to those of open lobectomy (OL), video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL), or RL as reported in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: The first 1,021 patients with NSCLC who underwent RL between 2010 and 2020 were matched with peers from the NCDB who had OL, VL, or RL. Matching was performed based on a propensity score calculated by logistic regression using multiple variables. Surgical outcomes included numbers of examined lymph nodes, performance of mediastinal lymphadenectomy, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using log-rank tests. Results: Most common postoperative complications were persistent air leak, atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia. Median LOS was 4 days, and the 30-day mortality rate was 1% (n=10/1,021). Compared to NCDB patients who underwent OL, NCI-CCC patients had a higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (P=0.001), higher rate of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (Pvs. 6 days; Pvs. 13.8%, Pvs. 9.5%; P Conclusions: RL for NSCLC performed in an NCI-CCC appears to have improved perioperative outcomes with comparable long-term OS compared to national benchmarks in OL and VL.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional studyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018
- Nationwide Assessment of Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2017
- Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2017
- Nodal Upstaging Is More Common with Thoracotomy than with VATS During Lobectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: An Analysis from the National Cancer Data BaseJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2016
- Pathologic Upstaging in Patients Undergoing Resection for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are There Modifiable Predictors?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015
- Predictors of conversion to thoracotomy for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A retrospective analysis and the influence of computed tomography–based calcification assessmentThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013
- Lymph Node Evaluation by Open or Video-Assisted Approaches in 11,500 Anatomic Lung Cancer ResectionsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- Robotic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Long-term oncologic resultsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012
- Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 armsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2011
- Unplanned Conversion to Thoracotomy During Video‐Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy does not Compromise the Surgical OutcomeWorld Journal of Surgery, 2010