Coronary Artery Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians: Long-Term Results

This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:

• Five-year outcomes of surgical or percutaneous myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients
  International Journal of Cardiology, 2013
• Comparison of Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2012
• Surgical Myocardial Revascularization versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents in Octogenarian Patients
  The Heart Surgery Forum, 2012
• Age-related differences in diagnosis, treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndromes: results from the German ALKK registry
  EuroIntervention, 2012
• Coronary artery surgery in octogenarians: evolving strategies for the improvement in early and late results
  Heart and Vessels, 2011
• Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Octogenarians: Long-Term Outcome Can Be Better Than Expected
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
• Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2008
• Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents
  Circulation, 2007
• A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes
  JACC, 2003
• Effect of age on the outcome of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at the Mayo Clinic
  The American Journal of Medicine, 2000