The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Judgment and Decision Making
- Vol. 7 (1) , 69-76
Abstract
The impact of default options on choice is a reliable, well-established behavioral finding. However, several different effects may lend to choosing defaults in an often indistinguishable manner, including loss aversion, inattention, information leakage, and transaction costs associated with switching. We introduce the notion of the “default pull” as the effect that even subtle default options have on decision makers’ uncertainty about their own preferences. The default pull shapes what a decision maker prefers by causing her to consider whether she prefers the default. We demonstrate default pull effects using a simple decision making task that strips away many of the usual reasons that defaults could affect choices, and we show that defaults can have substantial effects on choice, even when the default itself was not chosen.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Unique Costly Contemplation RepresentationEconometrica, 2010
- What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007
- Information leakage from logically equivalent framesCognition, 2006
- Recommendations Implicit in Policy DefaultsPsychological Science, 2006
- "Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable PreferencesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003
- The construction of preference.American Psychologist, 1995
- Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisionsJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993
- Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing PerspectiveAnnual Review of Psychology, 1992
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977
- Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 1969