Comparison of the Criterion-Related Validity of Sit-and-Reach Tests with and without Limb Length Adjustment in Asian Adults
Authors:
- Sai Chuen HuiSai Chuen Hui
- James R. MorrowJMJames R. Morrow
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 70 (4) , 401-406
Abstract
(1999). Comparison of the Criterion-Related Validity of Sit-and-Reach Tests with and without Limb Length Adjustment in Asian Adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport: Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 401-406.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Rationale for the Sit and Reach Test RevisitedMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 1998
- Relations of Sit-Up and Sit-and-Reach Tests to Low Back Pain in AdultsJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1998
- The Validity and Reliability of the Back Saver Sit-and-Reach Test in Middle School Girls and BoysResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1996
- The Validity of the Modified Sit-and-Reach Test in College-Age StudentsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1994
- How “Significant” is Your Reliability?Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1993
- A Comparison of the Sit and Reach and the Modified Sit and Reach in the Measurement of Flexibility in WomenResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1992
- On the Generality of the “Sit and Reach” Test: An Analysis of Flexibility Data for an Aging PopulationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1990
- Comparing the Sit and Reach with the Modified Sit and Reach in Measuring Flexibility in AdolescentsPediatric Exercise Science, 1990
- The Relationship of the Sit and Reach Test to Criterion Measures of Hamstring and Back Flexibility in Young FemalesResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1986
- Measurement of back movement.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1969