Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone–implant interface
Open Access
- 3 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BioMedical Engineering OnLine
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-18
Abstract
Background: The surgical success of cementless implants is determined by the evolution of the biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface (BII). One difficulty to model the biomechanical behavior of the BII comes from the implant surface roughness and from the partial contact between bone tissue and the implant. The determination of the constitutive law of the BII would be of interest in the context of implant finite element (FE) modeling to take into account the imperfect characteristics of the BII. The aim of the present study is to determine an effective contact stiffness $$\left( {K_{c}^{\text{FEM}} } \right)$$ of an osseointegrated BII accounting for its micromechanical features such as surface roughness, bone–implant contact ratio (BIC) and periprosthetic bone properties. To do so, a 2D FE model of the BII under normal contact conditions was developed and was used to determine the behavior of $$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$ .Results: The model is validated by comparison with three analytical schemes based on micromechanical homogenization including two Lekesiz’s models (considering interacting and non-interacting micro-cracks) and a Kachanov’s model. $$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$ is found to be comprised between 1013and 1015 N/m3according to the properties of the BII. $$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$ is shown to increase nonlinearly as a function of the BIC and to decrease as a function of the roughness amplitude for high BIC values (above around 20%). Moreover, $$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$ decreases as a function of the roughness wavelength and increases linearly as a function of the Young’s modulus of periprosthetic bone tissue.Conclusions: These results open new paths in implant biomechanical modeling since this model may be used in future macroscopic finite element models modeling the bone–implant system to replace perfectly rigid BII conditions.
Keywords
Funding Information
- European Research Council (682001)
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Healing Time on the Ultrasonic Response of the Bone-Implant InterfaceUltrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2012
- Numerical investigations on the osseointegration of uncemented endoprostheses based on bio-active interface theoryComputational Mechanics, 2011
- MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS DUE TO METALLIC FOREIGN BODIESVeterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2011
- Effective spring stiffness for a planar periodic array of collinear cracks at an interface between two dissimilar isotropic materialsMechanics of Materials, 2011
- Stress-based performance evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants by finite-element simulationSimulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2008
- ‘Universal’ microstructural patterns in cortical and trabecular, extracellular and extravascular bone materials: Micromechanics-based prediction of anisotropic elasticityJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2007
- Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfacesClinical Oral Implants Research, 2004
- Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegrationEuropean Spine Journal, 2001
- Osseointegrated Oral ImplantsJournal of Periodontology, 1988
- A Crack Between Dissimilar MediaJournal of Applied Mechanics, 1965