Operational Performance of Electric Power Firms: Comparison between Japan and South Korea by Non-Radial Measures
Open Access
Abstract
This study compares the electric power sectors between Japan and South (S) Korea. Both nations have been under a global trend of deregulation. To assess their progress due to industrial change and technology development, we use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as an assessment tool that enables us to evaluate the level of simultaneous achievements on economic and technological measures, so assessing the degree of holistic development. DEA has been widely applied for performance assessment in the past decades. In this study, the method compares electric power firms by their operational efficiencies. To compare their achievements, it is necessary to develop a new type of DEA application for performance measurement. The proposed approach adds two analytical capabilities. First, the approach needs to handle “zero” in a data set and then restrict multipliers (i.e., weights among inputs and outputs) without any prior information to increase our empirical reliability. No study has simultaneously explored the two capabilities in DEA. Using the proposed method, our empirical study identifies two findings. One of the two is that the electric power industry of S. Korea outperformed that of the Japanese industry in the observed periods (2014–2018) because the Japanese power sector still suffered from an occurrence of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster which occurred on 1 March 2011. However, the difference has been gradually diminishing because the Japanese electricity industry has been gradually recovering from the huge disaster. The other is that the S. Korean power industry has been in a descending trend because the nation has shown technical regress as a result of inconsistent technology development (e.g., shifting its R&D: Research and Development) focus from electrical engineering to chemistry). The former R&D area is essential in maintaining the technical level of S. Korea′s electric power industry.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy securityEnergy Policy, 2013
- Dynamics of productivity change in the Australian electricity industry: Assessing the impacts of electricity reformEnergy Policy, 2011
- DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generationEnergy Economics, 2011
- Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and densityResearch Policy, 2008
- Regulatory reforms and productivity: An empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industryEnergy Policy, 2008
- Regulatory reform of the electricity industry in Japan: What is the next step of deregulation?Energy Policy, 2006
- Electricity deregulation in OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countriesEnergy, 2006
- Technological Distance, Growth and Scale EffectsThe Economic Journal, 2002
- The efficiency of conventional fuel power plants in South Korea: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approachesInternational Journal of Production Economics, 2000
- Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programmingInternational Journal of Systems Science, 1989