Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate at the Time of Transurethral Resection: Importance of Evaluating Every Chip
Authors:
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 128 (5) , 948-950
Abstract
Incidental adenocarcinoma of the prostate has been divided into stage A1--less than 3 foci of well differentiated adenocarcinoma present and stage A2--3 or more foci of poorly differentiated tumor present. The clinical significance of these 2 stages has been well documented, with stage A1 lesions causing no increased mortality, while up to 30 per cent of patients with clinical stage A2 disease will have positive pelvic lymph nodes at exploration and, thus, will have surgical stage D1 tumor. Most pathology laboratories submit only a fraction of the transurethral resection chips for permanent blocks. In an effort to evaluate the over-all incidence and distribution of stages A1 and A2 lesions were began a prospective study in 1978 whereby all prostatic chips were submitted for permanent sections. A review of 500 consecutive cases of transurethral resection for clinically benign prostates before 1978 revealed 43 cases of adenocarcinoma: 10 (23 per cent) stage A1 and 33 (77 per cent) stage A2. A review of a similar series of 500 consecutive patients since 1978 revealed 71 cases of adenocarcinoma: 17 (24 per cent) clinical stage A1 and 54 (76 per cent) clinical stage A2. Thus, we found that since 178 incidental adenocarcinoma of the prostate has increased by 65 per cent and the distribution of stages A1 and A2 lesions has remained unchanged, 76 per cent of these lesions being clinical stage A2 with its much greater clinical significance. Evaluation of every chip does make a clinically significant difference in the subsequent management of patients with incidental adenocarcinoma of the prostate.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stage a prostate cancer from pathologist's viewpointUrology, 1981
- Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate: a Review of the Literature and Critical Reappraisal of ClassificationJournal of Urology, 1980
- Stage A2 prostatic carcinoma Should staging system be reclassified?Urology, 1979
- Differences in Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Clinical A2 Prostatic Cancer from A1 and B DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1978
- “Prevalence” of Prostatic CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Pelvic lymphadenectomy in stage a prostatic cancerUrology, 1977
- Increased Prevalence of Prostatic Carcinoma Due to More Thorough Microscopical ExaminationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Treatment of Stage 1 Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Preliminary ReportJournal of Urology, 1971
- Carcinoma of the Prostate in Elderly Men: Incidence, Growth Characteristics and Clinical SignificanceJournal of Urology, 1969
- Occult Prostatic Carcinoma Diagnosed by the Step-section Technique of the Surgical SpecimenJournal of Urology, 1965