Three Femoral Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Fixation on the Lateral Cortex Versus the Anterior Cortex
Authors:
- 26 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy
- Vol. 26 (6) , 796-807
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of 3 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction femoral fixation devices in a porcine model with implantation on both the lateral femoral cortex and the anterior femoral cortex. Methods: ACL reconstructions with an 8‐mm porcine tendon graft were performed on 48 porcine femurs with the EndoButton CL (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technology (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN), or EZLoc (Biomet Sports Medicine). In 8 specimens for each implant, the femoral tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 surgical position out the lateral cortex. In another 8 specimens for each implant, the tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 position to a standardized anterior femoral surface. Cyclic testing was performed on an MTS testing machine (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) from 50 N to 450 N for 2,000 cycles, followed by load‐to‐failure testing in specimens that survived. The cortical thickness and location of the implant exit were recorded. Results: In the lateral femur group, 0 of the EZLoc devices, 2 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 3 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing. In the anterior femur group, 1 of the EZLoc devices, 5 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 5 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing ( P = .012). In the anterior femur group, the ToggleLoc exhibited higher 2,000‐cycle elongation (5.46 ± 1 mm) than the EndoButton (3.55 ± 0.6 mm) ( P = .005). The EndoButton showed a higher first failure load (1,190.9 ± 150.0 N) than the ToggleLoc (912.6 ± 82.4 N) ( P = .007). The anterior cortex (1.4 mm) was thinner than the lateral cortex (1.7 mm) ( P = .0002). Conclusions: The EndoButton provided the strongest ACL femoral fixation with significantly less graft‐implant elongation and significantly higher failure loads. It was also shown in a porcine model that implants on the anterior cortical surface perform better than those on the lateral surface. Increased cortical thickness, in the range tested, was not associated with improved implant performance in the porcine model. Clinical Relevance: The EndoButton provided the best ACL femoral fixation of the devices tested.Keywords
Funding Information
- Smith and Nephew
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tensioning of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Hamstring Grafts: Comparing Equal Tension Versus Equal StressArthroscopy, 2008
- Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Femoral Tunnel Placement in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Does the Position of the Femoral Tunnel Affect the Laxity or Clinical Outcome of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee? A Clinical, Prospective, Randomized, Double‐Blind StudyArthroscopy, 2007
- Comparison Between Different Femoral Fixation Devices for ACL Reconstruction With Doubled Hamstring Tendon Graft: A Biomechanical AnalysisArthroscopy, 2006
- A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis for tunnel placement and buttons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionsJournal of Biomechanics, 2005
- Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walkingJournal of Biomechanics, 2004
- Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graftJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2002
- In vivo tensile behavior of a four‐bundle hamstring graft as a replacement for the anterior cruciate ligamentJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1997