The impact of body mass index on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study
Authors:
- Victoria Campos DornellesVDVictoria Campos Dornelles
- Marta Ribeiro HentschkeMHMarta Ribeiro Hentschke
- Mariangela BadalottiMBMariangela Badalotti
- Isadora Badalotti TelökenITIsadora Badalotti Telöken
- Vanessa Devens TrindadeVTVanessa Devens Trindade
- Bibiana CunegattoBCBibiana Cunegatto
- Natália Fontoura de VasconcelosNVNatália Fontoura de Vasconcelos
- Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da CostaBCBartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
- Alvaro PetraccoAPAlvaro Petracco
- Alexandre Vontobel PadoinAPAlexandre Vontobel Padoin
Open Access
- 28 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Women's Health
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) on laboratory, clinical outcomes and treatment costs of assisted reproduction, as there are still controversial and inconclusive studies on this subject. Methods: This research was retrospective cohort study, including women undergoing assisted reproduction in a Reproductive Medicine Center between 2013 and 2020. The participants were divided into groups according to BMI (kg/m2): Group 1 < 25; Group 2, 25–29.9 and Group 3, ≥ 30. A total of 1753 in vitro fertilization (IVF) fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles were included for assisted reproduction outcomes analysis and 1869 IVF-ET plus frozen embryo transfer (FET) for cumulative pregnancy analysis. Results: As higher the BMI, higher was the proportion of canceled IVF cycles (G1 (6.9%) vs. G2 (7.8%) vs. G3 (10.4%), p = 0.002) and gonadotropin’s total dose (IU) and treatment costs (G1 (1685 ± 595, U$ 683,02) vs. G2 (1779 ± 610, U$ 721,13) vs. G3 (1805 ± 563, U$ 764,09), p = 0.001). A greater number of mature oocytes was observed in G1 and G2 (6 [6.4–7.0] vs. 6 [5.6–6.6] vs. 4 [4.6–6.7], p = 0.011), which was not found in oocyte maturity rate (p = 0.877). A significant linear tendency (p = 0.042) was found in cumulative pregnancy rates, pointing to worse clinical outcomes in overweight and obese patients. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of considering the higher treatment costs for these patients, beyond all the well-known risks regarding weight excess, fertility, and pregnancy, before starting IVF treatments.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in JapanFertility and Sterility, 2014
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention In Vitro Fertilization Registry 2.0Fertility and Sterility, 2013
- Association between maternal body mass index during pregnancy, short‐term morbidity, and increased health service costs: a population‐based studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013
- The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology cyclesFertility and Sterility, 2012
- Complications and outcome of assisted reproduction technologies in overweight and obese womenHuman Reproduction, 2011
- Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth ratesHuman Reproduction, 2010
- Economic consequences of overweight and obesity in infertility: a framework for evaluating the costs and outcomes of fertility careHuman Reproduction Update, 2010
- Diet and Lifestyle in the Prevention of Ovulatory Disorder InfertilityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLOS Medicine, 2007
- WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile coupleReproductive Health Matters, 1994