Comparison of flat-dose versus weight-based dose nivolumab treatment in NSCLC patients
Authors:
- Muhammet CengizMCMuhammet Cengiz
- Oktay BozkurtOBOktay Bozkurt
- Ayse Nuransoy CengizACAyse Nuransoy Cengiz
- Deniz Can GuvenDGDeniz Can Guven
- Elif SahinESElif Sahin
- Emel Mutlu OzkanEOEmel Mutlu Ozkan
- Mustafa ErsoyMEMustafa Ersoy
- Ezgi TurkoğluETEzgi Turkoğlu
- Erdem KolemenEKErdem Kolemen
- Beyza UnluBUBeyza Unlu
- Hayati ArvasHAHayati Arvas
Open Access
- 8 May 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 16 (1)
Abstract
Nivolumab is currently widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. Studies have been conducted using flat doses of 240 mg and 3 mg/kg. In fact, studies involving a small number of patients have begun to explore low-dose immunotherapies. The literature on the optimal dose of immunotherapy, the use of weight based, or fixed doses is very recent and has become a one of the subject of ongoing research. This multicenter study included 716 patients with NSCLC. Patients receiving standard doses of 3 mg/kg and 240 mg of nivolumab were divided into subgroups based on their weight. Patients weighing 80 kg have already received a flat dose. However, patients weighing < 80 kg who received a flat dose were considered to be receiving high-dose therapy. Conversely, patients weighing more than 80 kg who received a flat dose were maintained on a low dose. Therefore, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity were examined according to weight-based usage. The median progression free survival (PFS) for those receiving a 3 mg/kg dose was 6 months, whereas it was 9.8 months for those receiving a flat dose (p < 0.001). The median (metastatic overall survival) OS for those receiving a 3 mg/kg dose was 12 months, whereas it was 14 months for those receiving a 240 mg dose (p = 0.03). This study was based on real-world data. Therefore, our results may be instructive regarding the nivolumab dose, which is a commonly used treatment for NSCLC patients. Our results suggest that a flat dose may be preferred in all groups and as a subgroup, especially in patients weighing < 80 kg.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global burden of lung cancer in 2022 and projections to 2050: Incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCANCancer Epidemiology, 2024
- Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Nivolumab in Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Audit from Resource-Constrained SettingsSouth Asian Journal of Cancer, 2024
- Population based study on the progress in survival of primarily metastatic lung cancer patients in GermanyScientific Reports, 2024
- Model-based evaluation of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab once every 4 weeks across multiple tumor typesAnnals of Oncology, 2020
- Benefit‐risk assessment of nivolumab 240 mg flat dose relative to 3 mg/kg Q2W regimen in Japanese patients with advanced cancersCancer Science, 2019
- Assessment of nivolumab benefit–risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 2017
- Lung Cancer Staging and Prognosis2016
- Nivolumab, anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody immunotherapy: Role in advanced cancersHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2016
- Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Safety and Activity of Anti–PD-L1 Antibody in Patients with Advanced CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012