Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa
Authors:
- Archana ShahASArchana Shah
- Bukola FawoleBFBukola Fawole
- James Machoki M'IMunyaJMJames Machoki M'IMunya
- Faouzi AmokraneFAFaouzi Amokrane
- Idi NafiouINIdi Nafiou
- Jean‐José WolombyJWJean‐José Wolomby
- Kidza MugerwaKMKidza Mugerwa
- Isilda NevesINIsilda Neves
- Rosemary NgutiRNRosemary Nguti
- Marius KublickasMKMarius Kublickas
- Matthews MathaiMMMatthews Mathai
- 27 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 107 (3) , 191-197
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes in African health facilities.Methods: Data were obtained from all births over 2–3 months in 131 facilities. Outcomes included maternal deaths, severe maternal morbidity, fresh stillbirths, and neonatal deaths and morbidity.Results: Median cesarean delivery rate was 8.8% among 83 439 births. Cesarean deliveries were performed in only 95 (73%) facilities. Facility‐specific cesarean delivery rates were influenced by previous cesarean, pre‐eclampsia, induced labor, referral status, and higher health facility classification scores. Pre‐eclampsia increased the risks of maternal death, fresh stillbirths, and severe neonatal morbidity. Adjusted emergency cesarean delivery rate was associated with more fresh stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and severe neonatal morbidity—probably related to prolonged labor, asphyxia, and sepsis. Adjusted elective cesarean delivery rate was associated with fewer perinatal deaths.Conclusion: Use of cesarean delivery is limited in the African health facilities surveyed. Emergency cesareans, when performed, are often too late to reduce perinatal deaths.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health2008
- Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective studyBMJ, 2007
- Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysisThe Lancet, 2006
- Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin AmericaThe Lancet, 2006
- The World Bank Annual Report 20052005
- World Trade Report 20052005
- High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population‐based cross sectional studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2003
- Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic reviewThe Lancet, 2001
- Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in SwedenBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2000
- Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study Commentary: all women should have a choice Commentary: increase in caesarean sections may reflect medical control not women's choice Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body"BMJ, 1999