Assessing the Uncertainty of Multiple Input Datasets in the Prediction of Water Resource Components
Open Access
Abstract
A large number of local and global databases for soil, land use, crops, and climate are now available from different sources, which often differ, even when addressing the same spatial and temporal resolutions. As the correct database is unknown, their impact on estimating water resource components (WRC) has mostly been ignored. Here, we study the uncertainty stemming from the use of multiple databases and their impacts on WRC estimates such as blue water and soil water for the Karkheh River Basin (KRB) in Iran. Four climate databases and two land use maps were used to build multiple configurations of the KRB model using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), which were similarly calibrated against monthly river discharges. We classified the configurations based on their calibration performances and estimated WRC for each one. The results showed significant differences in WRC estimates, even in models of the same class i.e., with similar performance after calibration. We concluded that a non-negligible level of uncertainty stems from the availability of different sources of input data. As the use of any one database among several produces questionable outputs, it is prudent for modelers to pay more attention to the selection of input data.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Setting up a hydrological model of Alberta: Data discrimination analyses prior to calibrationEnvironmental Modelling & Software, 2015
- Assessment of model predictions and parameter transferability by alternative land use data on watershed modelingJournal of Hydrology, 2015
- Modeller subjectivity and calibration impacts on hydrological model applications: An event-based comparison for a road-adjacent catchment in south-east NorwayScience of The Total Environment, 2015
- Characterising performance of environmental modelsEnvironmental Modelling & Software, 2013
- Data errors and hydrological modelling: The role of model structure to propagate observation uncertaintyAdvances in Water Resources, 2013
- Automatic Calibration of Hydrologic Models With Multi‐Objective Evolutionary Algorithm and Pareto Optimization1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007
- An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic predictionWater Resources Research, 2007
- Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methodsWater Resources Research, 2007
- Input data resolution analysis for distributed hydrological modelingJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- WATER QUALITY MODEL OUTPUT UNCERTAINTY AS AFFECTED BY SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF INPUT DATA1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2003