Identifying and classifying opioid‐related overdoses: A validation study
Open Access
- 24 April 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 28 (8) , 1127-1137
Abstract
Purpose: The study aims to develop and validate algorithms to identify and classify opioid overdoses using claims and other coded data, and clinical text extracted from electronic health records using natural language processing (NLP).Methods: Primary data were derived from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (2008–2014), an integrated health care system (~n > 475 000 unique individuals per year). Data includedInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision(ICD‐9) codes for nonfatal diagnoses,International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision(ICD‐10) codes for fatal events, clinical notes, and prescription medication records. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for algorithms relative to medical chart review and conducted assessments of algorithm portability in Kaiser Permanente Washington, Tennessee State Medicaid, and Optum.Results: Code‐based algorithm performance was excellent for opioid‐related overdoses (sensitivity = 97.2%, specificity = 84.6%) and classification of heroin‐involved overdoses (sensitivity = 91.8%, specificity = 99.0%). Performance was acceptable for code‐based suicide/suicide attempt classifications (sensitivity = 70.7%, specificity = 90.5%); sensitivity improved with NLP (sensitivity = 78.7%, specificity = 91.0%). Performance was acceptable for the code‐based substance abuse‐involved classification (sensitivity = 75.3%, specificity = 79.5%); sensitivity improved with the NLP‐enhanced algorithm (sensitivity = 80.5%, specificity = 76.3%). The opioid‐related overdose algorithm performed well across portability assessment sites, with sensitivity greater than 96% and specificity greater than 84%. Cross‐site sensitivity for heroin‐involved overdose was greater than 87%, specificity greater than or equal to 99%.Conclusions: Code‐based algorithms developed to detect opioid‐related overdoses and classify them according to heroin involvement perform well. Algorithms for classifying suicides/attempts and abuse‐related opioid overdoses perform adequately for use for research, particularly given the complexity of classifying such overdoses. The NLP‐enhanced algorithms for suicides/suicide attempts and abuse‐related overdoses perform significantly better than code‐based algorithms and are appropriate for use in settings that have data and capacity to use NLP.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinician Impression Versus Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Criteria in the Assessment of Drug-Seeking Behavior in the Emergency DepartmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2013
- Reduced Abuse, Therapeutic Errors, and Diversion Following Reformulation of Extended-Release Oxycodone in 2010The Journal of Pain, 2013
- Changes in oxycodone and heroin exposures in the National Poison Data System after introduction of extended‐release oxycodone with abuse‐deterrent characteristicsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2013
- Increasing trends in Schedule II opioid use and doctor shopping during 1999–2007 in California†Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2013
- Abuse Rates and Routes of Administration of Reformulated Extended-Release Oxycodone: Initial Findings From a Sentinel Surveillance Sample of Individuals Assessed for Substance Abuse TreatmentThe Journal of Pain, 2013
- Evolution of Opioid Risk Management and Review of the Classwide REMS for Extended-Release/Long-Acting OpioidsThe Physician and Sportsmedicine, 2012
- Curbing the Opioid Epidemic in the United StatesJAMA, 2012
- Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Other Interventions to Combat Prescription Opioid AbuseWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2011
- Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer PainThe Journal of Pain, 2009
- Opioid Contracts in Chronic Nonmalignant Pain Management: Objectives and UncertaintiesThe American Journal of Medicine, 2006