Six-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents
Authors:
- Joo-Yong HahnJHJoo-Yong Hahn
- Kyung Woo ParkKPKyung Woo Park
- Young Bin SongYSYoung Bin Song
- In-Ho ChaeICIn-Ho Chae
- Do-Sun LimDLDo-Sun Lim
- Kyoo-Rok HanKHKyoo-Rok Han
- Jin-Ho ChoiJCJin-Ho Choi
- Seung-Hyuk ChoiSCSeung-Hyuk Choi
- Hyun-Jae KangHKHyun-Jae Kang
- Bon-Kwon KooBKBon-Kwon Koo
- Taehoon AhnTATaehoon Ahn
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 24 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 125 (3) , 505-513
Abstract
Background—: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents remains undetermined. We aimed to test whether 6-month DAPT would be noninferior to 12-month DAPT after implantation of drug-eluting stents. Methods and Results—: We randomly assigned 1443 patients undergoing implantation of drug-eluting stents to receive 6- or 12-month DAPT (in a 1:1 ratio). The primary end point was a target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Rates of target vessel failure at 12 months were 4.8% in the 6-month DAPT group and 4.3% in the 12-month DAPT group (the upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.4%; P =0.001 for noninferiority with a predefined noninferiority margin of 4.0%). Although stent thrombosis tended to occur more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (0.9% versus 0.1%; hazard ratio, 6.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–49.96; P =0.10), the risk of death or myocardial infarction did not differ in the 2 groups (2.4% versus 1.9%; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.47; P =0.58). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, target vessel failure occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (hazard ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–7.03; P =0.005) among diabetic patients. Conclusions—: Six-month DAPT did not increase the risk of target vessel failure at 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents compared with 12-month DAPT. However, the noninferiority margin was wide, and the study was underpowered for death or myocardial infarction. Our results need to be confirmed in larger trials. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00698607.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Implantation of Drug-Eluting StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2008
- Incidence and Predictors of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis During and After Discontinuation of Thienopyridine TreatmentCirculation, 2007
- Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort studyThe Lancet, 2007
- Clopidogrel Use and Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationJAMA, 2007
- Late Clinical Events After Clopidogrel Discontinuation May Limit the Benefit of Drug-Eluting StentsJACC, 2006
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery LesionsCirculation, 2006
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome of Thrombosis After Successful Implantation of Drug-Eluting StentsJAMA, 2005
- A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003