An ECVAG inter-laboratory validation study of the comet assay: inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory variations of DNA strand breaks and FPG-sensitive sites in human mononuclear cells
- 27 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 28 (3) , 279-286
Abstract
The alkaline comet assay is an established, sensitive method extensively used in biomonitoring studies. This method can be modified to measure a range of different types of DNA damage. However, considerable differences in the protocols used by different research groups affect the inter-laboratory comparisons of results. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-laboratory, intra-laboratory, sample and residual (unexplained) variations in DNA strand breaks and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG)-sensitive sites measured by the comet assay by using a balanced Latin square design. Fourteen participating laboratories used their own comet assay protocols to measure the level of DNA strand breaks and FPG-sensitive sites in coded samples containing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and the level of DNA strand breaks in coded calibration curve samples (cells exposed to different doses of ionising radiation) on three different days of analysis. Eleven laboratories found dose–response relationships in the coded calibration curve samples on two or three days of analysis, whereas three laboratories had technical problems in their assay. In the coded calibration curve samples, the dose of ionising radiation, inter-laboratory variation, intra-laboratory variation and residual variation contributed to 60.9, 19.4, 0.1 and 19.5%, respectively, of the total variation. In the coded PBMC samples, the inter-laboratory variation explained the largest fraction of the overall variation of DNA strand breaks (79.2%) and the residual variation (19.9%) was much larger than the intra-laboratory (0.3%) and inter-subject (0.5%) variation. The same partitioning of the overall variation of FPG-sensitive sites in the PBMC samples indicated that the inter-laboratory variation was the strongest contributor (56.7%), whereas the residual (42.9%), intra-laboratory (0.2%) and inter-subject (0.3%) variations again contributed less to the overall variation. The results suggest that the variation in DNA damage, measured by comet assay, in PBMC from healthy subjects is assay variation rather than variation between subjects.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization with the Comet Assay for Targeted Examination of DNA Damage and Repair2010
- The Use of Bacterial Repair Endonucleases in the Comet Assay2010
- Measurement of DNA Interstrand Crosslinking in Individual Cells Using the Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet) Assay2009
- Modulation of nucleotide excision repair in human lymphocytes by genetic and dietary factorsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2009
- Differences in Repair of DNA Cross-links between Lymphocytes and Epithelial Tumor Cells from Colon Cancer Patients Measured In vitro with the Comet AssayClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair in vitro; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variationCell Biology and Toxicology, 2007
- The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and LimitationsMolecular Biotechnology, 2004
- Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assayMutagenesis, 2003
- Inter-individual differences in repair of DNA base oxidation, measured in vitro with the comet assayMutagenesis, 2001
- IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humansMutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research, 2000