Enolase autoantibodies and retinal function in multiple sclerosis patients

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background Electroretinographic (ERG) abnormalities have been reported in multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as the presence of circulating antiretinal antibodies. We and others have reported cases of impaired vision and diminished ERGs in MS patients with α-enolase autoantibodies. Anti-enolase antibodies have been implicated in autoimmune retinopathy. We performed this study to further explore the relationship between antiretinal antibodies and ERG changes in patients with MS. Methods Patients with clinically definite MS and normal visual acuity were recruited for this study, along with healthy controls. All patients and controls had ERG testing done according to ISCEV standards. Patient and control sera were analyzed for the presence of antiretinal antibodies using Western blot and ELISA techniques, and HLA class II typing was performed using polymerase chain reaction. Results We found a statistically significant difference between MS patients and controls in the rod-cone b-wave implicit time (p < 0.005). We found autoantibodies against α-enolase in 38% of MS patients and 11% of controls (p < 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between ERG parameters of MS patients with α-enolase autoantibodies compared to those without α-enolase antibodies. Furthermore, the presence of α-enolase did not associate with a particular HLA haplotype. Conclusions Factors affecting the retina other than α-enolase antibodies may account for the delayed rod-cone b-wave implicit times observed in MS patients in this study. Anti-enolase antibodies are likely an epiphenomenon of autoimmune disease, and are not causing retinopathy in MS patients with normal visual acuity. However, the possibility of rare cases of patients with pathogenic α-enolase autoantibodies can not be excluded. The pathogenic contribution of these antibodies in MS patients with visual impairment deserves further investigation.

This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit: