Resident Duty Hours and Medical Education Policy — Raising the Evidence Bar
Authors:
- 4 May 2017
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 376 (18) , 1704-1706
Abstract
On March 10, 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) issued revised common program requirements for residents that go into effect this July. The revisions emphasize the importance of teamwork, flexibility, and physician welfare during training, but all the attention has been (and will no doubt remain) focused on the changes in duty hours. The new rules maintain an 80-hour-per-week cap on residents’ work, averaged over 4 weeks, but extend the permissible work shifts for first-year residents from 16 hours to 24 — limits already in place for residents in year 2 and beyond — and permit more within-shift flexibility as long as weekly duty-hour limits are met. What makes this policy change so important is that it seems to reverse direction on the basis of a new approach to developing and using evidence to inform education policy.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Duty-Hour Flexibility in Surgical TrainingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Innovation in Medical EducationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Duty-Hour Limits and Patient Care and Resident Outcomes: Can High-Quality Studies Offer Insight into Complex Relationships?Annual Review of Medicine, 2013
- The Libby Zion CaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988