On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Models
Preprint
Abstract
There is a growing concern that learned conditional generative models may output samples that are substantially similar to some copyrighted data $C$ that was in their training set. We give a formal definition of $\textit{near access-freeness (NAF)}$ and prove bounds on the probability that a model satisfying this definition outputs a sample similar to $C$, even if $C$ is included in its training set. Roughly speaking, a generative model $p$ is $\textit{$k$-NAF}$ if for every potentially copyrighted data $C$, the output of $p$ diverges by at most $k$-bits from the output of a model $q$ that $\textit{did not access $C$ at all}$. We also give generative model learning algorithms, which efficiently modify the original generative model learning algorithm in a black box manner, that output generative models with strong bounds on the probability of sampling protected content. Furthermore, we provide promising experiments for both language (transformers) and image (diffusion) generative models, showing minimal degradation in output quality while ensuring strong protections against sampling protected content.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Language Models Plagiarize?2023
- Preventing Generation of Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy2023
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better2022
- Training Text-to-Text Transformers with Privacy Guarantees2022
- Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-DuplicatesJournal of Imaging, 2020
- The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy2013
- Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis2006