Internet-Based and Mobile-Based General Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey
Open Access
- 25 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 20 (9) , e266
Abstract
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: As a promising technology for the promotion of quality healthcare, mHealth is increasing in the world. To make full use of the advantages, an increase of internet hospitals established in China. However, there is no study of the service scope and patient satisfaction of the internet hospital yet. Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the features of outpatients in general practice clinic of the internet hospital in order to provide the references for general practitioners (GPs) who will work for online clinic. Methods: Data were collected from the internet hospital of the first affiliated hospital, Zhejiang University between February 2016 and February 2017. Patients logon the internet hospital with the computer or mobile phone. The information included patients’ characteristics and the information of diseases. Results: There were totally 715 visits. According to the system classification, the former five ones were musculoskeletal system (12.73%), the digestive system (11.33%), the reproductive system (9.23%), urinary tract (7.69%) and the endocrine system (6.58%). According to the management, 451 patients (63.08%) should visit the offline clinic, 181 patients (25.31%) had received medication or test appointment, 9 people (1.26%) should use emergency department, and 74 people (10.35%) need supportive counseling. All patients received the corresponding health education. According to the diagnosis, 563 patients (78.74%) are diagnosed, while 152 individuals (21.26%) are medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). Conclusions: Internet- and mobile-based online practice is feasible and convenient for patients with high satisfaction. Patients with chronic disease, health consultation and health education are suitable for internet hospital.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shortage of healthcare professionals in ChinaBMJ, 2016
- Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the NetherlandsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2016
- The internet hospital: an emerging innovation in ChinaThe Lancet Global Health, 2015
- The cost-effectiveness of the MobileMums intervention to increase physical activity among mothers with young children: a Markov model informed by a randomised controlled trialBMJ Open, 2015
- Patients with persistent medically unexplained physical symptoms: a descriptive study from Norwegian general practiceBMC Family Practice, 2014
- Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- Ethical Principles for Physician Rating SitesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Can insurance increase financial risk?Journal of Health Economics, 2008
- Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance modelInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2007
- The World Health report 2006 1 : Working together for health 2Education for Health, 2006