How and Why Did a Regional Palliative Care Program Lead to Changes in a Region? A Qualitative Analysis of the Japan OPTIM Study
Authors:
- 1 May 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Vol. 47 (5) , 849-859
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Third Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer Health
- Labour Sciences Research Grants in Japan
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality Improvement in Cancer Symptom Assessment and Control: The Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012
- Review: Improving end-of-life care: a critical review of the Gold Standards Framework in primary carePalliative Medicine, 2010
- A national facilitation project to improve primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework on process and self-ratings of qualityQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care: a qualitative study of three primary care trustsPalliative Medicine, 2008
- Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards FrameworkBritish Journal of General Practice, 2008
- Facilitating good process in primary palliative care: does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance?Family Practice, 2007
- Utilization and costs of the introduction of system-wide palliative care in Alberta, 19932000Palliative Medicine, 2005
- Quality of Life in Palliative Cancer Care: Results From a Cluster Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- A palliative-care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000