Developing an evidence-based methodological framework to systematically compare HTA coverage decisions: A mixed methods study

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

• A REVIEW OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS: CASE STUDIES IN ONCOLOGY
  International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2012
• Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: A comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions
  Health Policy, 2012
• Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence
  British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2010
• EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the Confusion
  The Milbank Quarterly, 2010
• Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions
  JAMA, 2009
• Methods, procedures, and contextual characteristics of health technology assessment and health policy decision making: Comparison of health technology assessment agencies in Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Sweden
  International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009
• Centralized Drug Review Processes In Australia, Canada, New Zealand, And The United Kingdom
  Health Affairs, 2006
• The development of health technology assessment
  Health Policy, 2003
• BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS
  International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2002
• A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
  Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960