A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity
- 1 February 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 70, 200-205
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Observational evidence and strength of evidence domains: case examplesSystematic Reviews, 2014
- Assessment of a method to detect signals for updating systematic reviewsSystematic Reviews, 2014
- Observational Study Designs for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Alternative Approach to Close Evidence Gaps in Head-and-Neck CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2014
- Mammographic Screening and Breast Cancer Mortality: A Case–Control Study and Meta-analysisCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2012
- Distinguishing Case Series From Cohort StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2012
- Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size RequirementsPhysical Therapy, 2005
- Effect of Smoking Cessation on Mortality After Myocardial InfarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.orgAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Study design for technology assessment: critical issuesHealth Policy, 1988