Development of a Multidimensional Additive Points System for Determining Access to Rheumatology Services
Authors:
- Douglas WhiteDWDouglas White
- Kamal SolankiKSKamal Solanki
- Vicki QuinceyVQVicki Quincey
- Andrew MinettAMAndrew Minett
- Alan DoubeADAlan Doube
- Ray NadenRNRay Naden
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
- Vol. 21 (5) , 239-243
Abstract
In many countries, including New Zealand, the demand for rheumatology services exceeds their supply, resulting in some patients experiencing long delays or being denied access. The principal aim of this work was to create a validated, transparent, and fair system for determining access to rheumatology services. A panel of 5 rheumatologists, 6 primary care physicians, and 4 nurse specialists ranked a series of 25 clinical scenarios in order of priority to see a rheumatologist. Important determining factors were weighted in an iterative process to generate a multidimensional additive point score to determine access to rheumatology service. The score comprises 6 domains of 2 to 4 items weighted to give a total score out of 100. The effect of the problem on the patient's life and role, the presence of an inflammatory rheumatic disease, appropriateness of current treatment, and the ability of the rheumatologist to influence the current symptoms and future prognosis were felt to be critical factors in determining access to the service. The score showed a strong correlation with the rankings agreed by the clinical panel, and the overall intraclass correlation coefficient for the rheumatologists was 0.698. Our score has face validity, is easy to perform, and has been assessed by an independent panel of rheumatologists as providing a fair system for determining access to rheumatology services. The system is acceptable to primary care physicians and has been adopted by our local primary care organizations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of two referral strategies for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: the Recognising and Diagnosing Ankylosing Spondylitis Reliably (RADAR) studyAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2013
- Relative urgency for referral from primary care to rheumatologists: The Priority Referral ScoreArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- Time to Treatment in Rheumatoid ArthritisJCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- The United States rheumatology workforce: Supply and demand, 2005–2025Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2007
- Early referral recommendations for ankylosing spondylitis (including pre-radiographic and radiographic forms) in primary careAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2005
- Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: A population studyArthritis Care & Research, 2005
- Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guideAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2002
- Referrals from General Practice to an Outpatient Rheumatology Clinic: Disease Spectrum and Analysis of Referral LettersClinical Rheumatology, 2000
- Rheumatology out-patient workload increases inexorablyRheumatology, 1997
- Rheumatic Disorders in Primary Care: A Study of Two Primary Care Centres and a Review of Previous Swedish Reports on Primary CareScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1981