Differential Contributions of the Primate Ventrolateral Prefrontal and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Serial Reversal Learning
Authors:
- Rafal RygulaRRRafal Rygula
- Susannah C. WalkerSWSusannah C. Walker
- Hannah F. ClarkeHCHannah F. Clarke
- Trevor W. RobbinsTRTrevor W. Robbins
- Angela C. RobertsARAngela C. Roberts
Open Access
- 27 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 30 (43) , 14552-14559
Abstract
The discrimination reversal paradigm is commonly used to measure a subject's ability to adapt their behavior according to changes in stimulus–reward contingencies. Human functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated activations in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in subjects performing this task. Excitotoxic lesions of analogous regions in marmosets have revealed, however, that although the OFC is indeed critical for reversal learning, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) (analogous to IFG) is not, contributing instead to higher order processing, such as that required in attentional set-shifting and strategy transfer. One major difference between the marmoset and human studies has been the level of training subjects received in reversal learning, being far greater in the latter. Since exposure to repeated contingency changes, as occurs in serial reversal learning, is likely to trigger the development of higher order, rule-based strategies, we hypothesized a critical role of the marmoset VLPFC in performance of a serial reversal learning paradigm. After extensive training in reversal learning, marmosets received an excitotoxic lesion of the VLPFC, OFC, or a sham control procedure. In agreement with our prediction, postsurgery, VLPFC lesioned animals were impaired in performing a series of discrimination reversals, but only when novel visual stimuli were introduced. In contrast, OFC lesioned animals were impaired regardless of whether the visual stimuli were the same or different from those used during presurgery training. Together, these data demonstrate the heterogeneous but interrelated involvement of primate OFC and VLPFC in the performance of serial reversal learning.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Separable Learning Systems in the Macaque Brain and the Role of Orbitofrontal Cortex in Contingent LearningNeuron, 2010
- A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviourNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2009
- Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex is required for performance of a strategy implementation task but not reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeysEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2009
- Selective Aspiration or Neurotoxic Lesions of Orbital Frontal Areas 11 and 13 Spared Monkeys' Performance on the Object Discrimination Reversal TaskJournal of Neuroscience, 2009
- Striatal Dopamine Predicts Outcome-Specific Reversal Learning and Its Sensitivity to Dopaminergic Drug AdministrationThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2009
- Double Dissociation of the Effects of Medial and Orbital Prefrontal Cortical Lesions on Attentional and Affective Shifts in MiceThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
- Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions do not impair tests of scene learning and decision‐making that require frontal–temporal interactionEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
- The Contribution of Orbitofrontal Cortex to Action SelectionAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Reconciling the Roles of Orbitofrontal Cortex in Reversal Learning and the Encoding of Outcome ExpectanciesAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Orbital Prefrontal Cortex Is Required for Object-in-Place Scene Memory But Not Performance of a Strategy Implementation TaskJournal of Neuroscience, 2007