Exome sequence read depth methods for identifying copy number changes
Authors:
- Latha KadalayilLKLatha Kadalayil
- Sajjad RafiqSRSajjad Rafiq
- Matthew J. J. Rose-ZerilliMatthew J. J. Rose-Zerilli
- Reuben J. PengellyRPReuben J. Pengelly
- Helen ParkerHPHelen Parker
- David OscierDODavid Oscier
- Jonathan C. StreffordJSJonathan C. Strefford
- William J. TapperWTWilliam J. Tapper
- Jane GibsonJGJane Gibson
- Sarah EnnisSESarah Ennis
- Andrew CollinsACAndrew Collins
Open Access
- 28 August 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 16 (3) , 380-392
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) play important roles in a number of human diseases and in pharmacogenetics. Powerful methods exist for CNV detection in whole genome sequencing (WGS) data, but such data are costly to obtain. Many disease causal CNVs span or are found in genome coding regions (exons), which makes CNV detection using whole exome sequencing (WES) data attractive. If reliably validated against WGS-based CNVs, exome-derived CNVs have potential applications in a clinical setting. Several algorithms have been developed to exploit exome data for CNV detection and comparisons made to find the most suitable methods for particular data samples. The results are not consistent across studies. Here, we review some of the exome CNV detection methods based on depth of coverage profiles and examine their performance to identify problems contributing to discrepancies in published results. We also present a streamlined strategy that uses a single metric, the likelihood ratio, to compare exome methods, and we demonstrated its utility using the VarScan 2 and eXome Hidden Markov Model (XHMM) programs using paired normal and tumour exome data from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. We use array-based somatic CNV (SCNV) calls as a reference standard to compute prevalence-independent statistics, such as sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio, for validation of the exome-derived SCNVs. We also account for factors known to influence the performance of exome read depth methods, such as CNV size and frequency, while comparing our findings with published results.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing dataBriefings in Bioinformatics, 2014
- Discovery and Statistical Genotyping of Copy-Number Variation from Whole-Exome Sequencing DepthThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2012
- Detection of structural variants and indels within exome dataNature Methods, 2011
- Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discoveryNature Reviews Genetics, 2011
- Copy number variants in pharmacogenetic genesTrends in Molecular Medicine, 2011
- Population-genetic nature of copy number variations in the human genomeHuman Molecular Genetics, 2009
- High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencingNature Methods, 2008
- Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencingNature Genetics, 2008
- Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human GenomeThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2005
- Fine-scale structural variation of the human genomeNature Genetics, 2005