Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies
Authors:
- George HripcsakGHGeorge Hripcsak
- Daniel F. HeitjanDHDaniel F. Heitjan
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Vol. 35 (2) , 99-110
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reference Standards, Judges, and Comparison Subjects: Roles for Experts in Evaluating System PerformanceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002
- Evaluation of the Quality of Information Retrieval of Clinical Findings from a Computerized Patient Database Using a Semantic Terminological ModelJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000
- Unlocking Clinical Data from Narrative Reports: A Study of Natural Language ProcessingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Bias, prevalence and kappaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Comparison of computer-aided and human review of general practitioners' management of hypertensionThe Lancet, 1991
- High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Computer-Aided Assessment of Transient Ischemic AttacksArchives of Neurology, 1984
- Measuring Agreement for Multinomial Data1982
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960