Benefits and harms of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer: a meta-analysis
Authors:
- Marcello TonelliMarcello Tonelli
- Brenda HemmelgarnBHBrenda Hemmelgarn
- Tony ReimanTRTony Reiman
- Braden MannsBMBraden Manns
- M. Neil ReaumeMRM. Neil Reaume
- Anita LloydALAnita Lloyd
- Natasha WiebeNatasha Wiebe
- Scott KlarenbachSKScott Klarenbach
- 30 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 180 (11) , E62-E71
Abstract
Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are used to treat anemia in patients with cancer. However, their safety and effectiveness is controversial. We did a systematic review of the clinical efficacy and harms of these agents in adults with anemia related to cancer or chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using accepted methods for literature searches, article selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We included RCTs involving anemic adults with cancer. We compared the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with nonuse and assessed clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events and hypertension, health-related quality of life, blood transfusions and tumour response) and harms (serious adverse events) between groups. Results: We identified 52 trials (n = 12 006) that met our selection criteria. The pooled all-cause mortality during treatment was significantly higher in the group receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy than in the control group (relative risk [RR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.29). Compared with no treatment, use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents led to clinically detectable improvements in disease-specific measures of quality of life. It also reduced the use of blood transfusions (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.73). However, it led to an increased risk of thrombotic events (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.24) and serious adverse events (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.25). Interpretation: Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer-related anemia improved some disease-specific measures of quality of life and decreased the use of blood transfusions. However, it increased the risk of death and serious adverse events. Our findings suggest that such therapy not be used routinely as an alternative to blood transfusion in patients with anemia related to cancer.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of maintaining hemoglobin levels above 12.0 g/dL with erythropoietin vs above 10.0 g/dL without erythropoietin in anemic patients receiving concurrent radiation and cisplatin for cervical cancerGynecologic Oncology, 2008
- Epoetin alfa in platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients: results of a multinational, multicentre, randomised trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Effects of early intervention with epoetin alfa on transfusion requirement, hemoglobin level and survival during platinum-based chemotherapy: Results of a multicenter randomised controlled trialEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Controlled multicentre study of the influence of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin on anaemia and transfusion dependency in patients with ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapyMedical Oncology, 1998
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Erythropoietin for anaemia in cancer patientsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986