Predicting Robot-Based Tracking Performance After Stroke Using Lesion Features and Clinical Assessments: A Pilot Study
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Following stroke, motor and cognitive impairments often limit functional independence. Personalized rehabilitation requires comprehensive clinical assessments, which are costly and time-consuming. Imaging scans are routinely collected, but their predictive value in determining post-stroke function remains unclear. Objectives: To determine the ability of clinical assessments, lesion features with medical chart information, and a combined clinical and biomedical model to predict kinematic outcomes from a robot-based tracking task in chronic stroke individuals. Methods: Eighteen participants (70±6 years) completed a robot-based tracking task and a battery of motor and cognitive assessments. Three elastic net regression models were developed: 1) clinical assessments only; 2) lesion metrics and chart information only; and 3) a combined model. Models were evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, bootstrapping, and permutation testing with false discovery rate correction. Robot-based outcomes included tracking error, normalized distance, velocity error response, and delay. Results: The clinical assessment model significantly predicted tracking error (R²=0.45), delay (R²=0.22), velocity error response (R²=0.18), and normalized distance (R²=0.12). The combined model significantly predicted tracking error (R²=0.37), delay (R²=0.19), and velocity error response (R²=0.11). The imaging model did not significantly predict any outcome. Box and Blocks Test and Color Trails 1 were stable features. The right dorsal attention network was a stable predictor in several combined models. Conclusion: Clinical assessments outperformed lesion features in predicting tracking performance after chronic stroke. Attention- and motor-related measures were the strongest predictors, highlighting the importance of cognitive-motor interactions in function. A larger sample and more granular lesion features may improve prediction from imaging biomarkers.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (T32AR007132-48)
- Penn Fontaine Society
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining clinical and imaging data for predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: an automated machine learning approachScientific Reports, 2023
- Bringing MRI to low‐ and middle‐income countries: Directions, challenges and potential solutionsNMR in Biomedicine, 2023
- A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithmsScientific Data, 2022
- Neuroimaging of Acute StrokeNeurologic Clinics, 2020
- Using Robotics to Quantify Impairments in Sensorimotor Ability, Visuospatial Attention, Working Memory, and Executive Function After Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2018
- PREP2: A biomarker‐based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after strokeAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 2017
- Probabilistic conversion of neurosurgical DBS electrode coordinates into MNI spaceNeuroImage, 2017
- The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patientsAnnals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2015
- Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula functionBrain Structure and Function, 2010
- Awareness of disabilities in stroke rehabilitation--a clinical trialDisability and Rehabilitation, 2003