Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative anticoagulation in suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Open Access
- 20 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood Advances
- Vol. 6 (10) , 3114-3125
Abstract
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication associated with high medical costs. Factor Xa inhibitors gradually replace approved treatment with intravenous direct thrombin inhibitors despite their off-label indication, because of easier management and favorable economic profile. Whether they are cost-effective remains unclear. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of approved and off-label anticoagulants in patients with suspected HIT, based on census data from the largest Swiss hospital between 2015 and 2018. We constructed a decision tree model that reflects important clinical events associated with HIT. Relevant cost data were obtained from the finance department or estimated based on the Swiss-wide cost tariff. We estimated averted adverse events (AEs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as primary outcome parameters. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses with 2000 simulations to assess the robustness of our results. In the base-case analysis, the total cost of averting 1 AE was 49 565 Swiss francs (CHF) for argatroban, 30 380 CHF for fondaparinux, and 30 610 CHF for rivaroxaban; after adjusting for 4Ts score: 41 152 CHF (argatroban), 27 710 CHF (fondaparinux), and 37 699 CHF (rivaroxaban). Fondaparinux and rivaroxaban were more clinically effective than argatroban, with AEs averted of 0.820, 0.834, and 0.917 for argatroban, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban, respectively. Treatment with fondaparinux resulted in less cost and more AEs averted, hence dominating argatroban. Results were most sensitive to AE rates and prolongation of stay. Monte Carlo simulations affirmed our base-case analysis. This is the first cost-effectiveness analysis comparing argatroban with fondaparinux and rivaroxaban using primary data. Fondaparinux and rivaroxaban resulted in more averted AEs, but fondaparinux had greater cost savings. Fondaparinux could be a viable alternative to argatroban.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Treatment and Prevention of Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaChest, 2012
- The Direct Medical Costs Associated with Suspected Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaPharmacoEconomics, 2011
- The costs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a patient-based cost of illness analysisJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- The Financial Impact of Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaChest, 2008
- Fondaparinux for the treatment of patients with acute heparininduced thrombocytopeniaThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2008
- Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trialBMJ, 2006
- Lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia – results of the third prospective study (HAT-3) and a combined analysis of HAT-1, HAT-2, and HAT-3Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- The Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Task Force Model: Implementing Quality Improvement and Economic Outcome InitiativesSeminars in Hematology, 2005
- Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1994