Improving legal judgment prediction through reinforced criminal element extraction
Authors:
- Yougang LyuYLYougang Lyu
- Zihan WangZWZihan Wang
- Zhaochun RenZRZhaochun Ren
- Pengjie RenPRPengjie Ren
- Zhumin ChenZCZhumin Chen
- Xiaozhong LiuXLXiaozhong Liu
- Yujun LiYLYujun Li
- Hongsong LiHLHongsong Li
- Hongye SongHSHongye Song
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Information Processing & Management
- Vol. 59 (1)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Query-focused multi-document summarization using hypergraph-based rankingInformation Processing & Management, 2016
- A reinforcement learning formulation to the complex question answering problemInformation Processing & Management, 2015
- Human-level control through deep reinforcement learningNature, 2015
- Predicting associated statutes for legal problemsInformation Processing & Management, 2015
- The Supreme Court's Many Median JusticesAmerican Political Science Review, 2012
- The Presumption of Innocence in the French and Anglo-American Legal TraditionsThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 2010
- The Presumption of Innocence and the Human Rights ActThe Modern Law Review, 2004
- Automatic text structuring and categorization as a first step in summarizing legal casesInformation Processing & Management, 1997
- Classification of legal texts by computerInformation Processing & Management, 1976
- Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically: A Quantitative Analysis of the “Right to Counsel” CasesAmerican Political Science Review, 1957