The Interaction between Interstitial Inflammatory Cells and Fibrosis-Repair Mechanisms in Tubuloglomerular Diseases
Authors:
- Mario Alamilla-SanchezMario Alamilla-Sanchez
- Carolina González-FuentesCGCarolina González-Fuentes
- Víctor Ulloa GalvánVGVíctor Ulloa Galván
- Benjamín Yamá EstrellaBEBenjamín Yamá Estrella
- Martín Carbajal ZárateMZMartín Carbajal Zárate
- Jorge Salazar HurtadoJHJorge Salazar Hurtado
- Daniel Delgado PinedaDPDaniel Delgado Pineda
- Óscar Lara PalafoxÓPÓscar Lara Palafox
- Andrea Estrada MéndezAMAndrea Estrada Méndez
- Francisco Javier Martínez HernándezFHFrancisco Javier Martínez Hernández
Open Access
- 29 September 2026
- book chapter
- Published by IntechOpen
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease progression is closely linked to tubulointerstitial inflammation, fibrosis, and tubular atrophy, which often predict renal outcomes better than the initiating glomerular lesion. This chapter reviews the cellular, molecular, histopathological, and biomarker evidence connecting interstitial injury with kidney disease. Fibroblasts derived from metanephric stromal progenitors retain substantial phenotypic plasticity. After injury, inflammatory mediators, TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor, Toll-like receptor signaling, and mechanotransduction induce myofibroblast transition, extracellular matrix deposition, and loss of erythropoietin production. Chronic inflammation may also generate tertiary lymphoid structures that sustain local T- and B-cell activation, autoantibody production, and tissue damage. Intrarenal renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system activation, proteinuria-induced lysosomal and mitochondrial stress, cellular senescence, and alternative complement pathway activation further amplify tubular inflammation and fibrosis. In IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance, and kidney transplantation, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy consistently predict treatment resistance, declining estimated glomerular filtration rate, kidney failure, and reduced graft survival. Urinary biomarkers may noninvasively capture tubular injury or dysfunction (KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, α1- and β2-microglobulin), inflammation (MCP-1/CCL2, CXCL9), stress and fibrosis (DKK-3), and functional tubular mass and repair (uEGF). However, assay heterogeneity, disease-specific performance, age-related variation, and absent universal thresholds limit routine use. Future studies should test whether longitudinal biomarker trajectories detect reversible inflammation before fixed scarring and whether biomarker-guided treatment improves outcomes. Integrating histopathology, clinical variables, and validated biomarker panels may refine prognosis and enable earlier, mechanism-directed interventions.Keywords
This publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interplay of immune and kidney resident cells in the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures in lupus nephritisAutoimmunity Reviews, 2021
- The extent of tubulointerstitial inflammation is an independent predictor of renal survival in lupus nephritisJournal Of Nephrology, 2021
- Tubulointerstitial damage and interstitial immune cell phenotypes are useful predictors for renal survival and relapse in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitisJournal Of Nephrology, 2020
- Myofibroblast in Kidney Fibrosis: Origin, Activation, and Regulation2019
- Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 in renal diseaseClinica Chimica Acta, 2018
- The multisystemic functions of FOXD1 in development and diseaseJournal of Molecular Medicine, 2018
- Predicting outcomes of lupus nephritis with tubulointerstitial inflammation and scarringArthritis Care & Research, 2011
- CC-chemokine receptor 2 required for bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosisCytokine, 2003
- Postnatal maturation of renal cortical peritubular fibroblasts in the ratBrain Structure and Function, 1998
- Morphology of interstitial cells in the healthy kidneyBrain Structure and Function, 1996