Using Simulation to Define the Learning Curve for the Digital Cervical Examination
Authors:
- Rubymel J. KnuppRKRubymel J. Knupp
- Janet A. ToozeJTJanet A. Tooze
- Chenchen H. SunCSChenchen H. Sun
- Sha JinSJSha Jin
- Brian C. BrostBBBrian C. Brost
- 1 October 2019
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 134 (1) , 1S-8S
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To assess how skill in the digital cervical examination is acquired in medical students. METHODS: In a longitudinal study, medical students completed 200 simulated cervical examinations. We performed regressions of each student's cumulative accuracy using the linear, power, and sigmoidal models to determine best fit. We also constructed multilevel models to determine the influence of dilation and effacement on accuracy and to determine whether the starting level and rate of learning varied between individuals. To assess skill decay, we assessed accuracy at 1, 2, and 5 months after training. We defined the amount of sustained accuracy needed to achieve competence using cumulative summation analyses and determined the amount of practice needed to reach this level of skill. RESULTS: Twenty-five medical students participated. The median (interquartile range) of cumulative accuracy at the end of the study was 69% (65–78) for dilation and 80% (76–91) for effacement. The sigmoidal model had the best fit. All students achieved competence during the study. The multilevel models showed that accuracy decreased with higher dilation and lower effacement and found that starting level and rate of learning varied between individuals. Maximal accuracy in both dilation and effacement was seen after 150 repetitions. Accuracy of the medical students persisted for 1 month for dilation and 2 months for effacement. The average±SD number of repetitions needed to achieve competence was 89±46 (range 35–195) for dilation and 48±38 (range 11–174) for effacement. DISCUSSION: Based on the variability in skill between individuals and the rate of skill acquisition and decay, we feel that a competence-based rather than time-based approach is most appropriate, that trainee performance should be monitored both during and after training, and that 150 repetitions, or more, should be included in any digital cervical examination simulation regimen.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective study into the benefits of simulation training in teaching obstetric vaginal examinationInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2016
- Learning Curves in Health Professions EducationAcademic Medicine, 2015
- Use of the Learning Curve–Cumulative Summation test for quantitative and individualized assessment of competency of a surgical procedure in obstetrics and gynecology: fetoscopic laser ablation as a modelAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Learning curve of transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of endometriomas assessed by the cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM)Fertility and Sterility, 2011
- Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation techniqueUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUMBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- TIME TO CUSUM: SIMPLIFIED REPORTING OF OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL SURGERYAnz Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2007
- Establishing Learning Curves for Surgical Residents Using Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) AnalysisCurrent Surgery, 2005
- Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004