Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger
Authors:
- Friederike HendriksFHFriederike Hendriks
- Dorothe KienhuesDKDorothe Kienhues
- Rainer BrommeRBRainer Bromme
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Studies in Communication Sciences
- Vol. 16 (2) , 124-131
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)PLOS ONE, 2015
- Scientists' views about communication trainingJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015
- Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014
- The Public's Bounded Understanding of ScienceEducational Psychologist, 2014
- Science, New Media, and the PublicScience, 2013
- The changing information environment for nanotechnology: online audiences and contentJournal of Nanoparticle Research, 2010
- Science journalism: Supplanting the old media?Nature, 2009
- Advancing Science through Conversations: Bridging the Gap between Blogs and the AcademyPLOS Biology, 2008
- Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchersPublic Understanding of Science, 2008
- Responding to serious medical error in general practice--consequences for the GPs involved: analysis of 75 cases from GermanyFamily Practice, 2007