Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
The behavioural rhythms of organisms are thought to be under strong selection, influenced by the rhythmicity of the environment 1–4 . Such behavioural rhythms are well studied in isolated individuals under laboratory conditions 1,5 , but free-living individuals have to temporally synchronize their activities with those of others, including potential mates, competitors, prey and predators 6–10 . Individuals can temporally segregate their daily activities (e.g. prey avoiding predators, subordinates avoiding dominants) or synchronize their activities (e.g. group foraging, communal defence, pairs reproducing or caring for offspring) 6–9,11 . The behavioural rhythms that emerge from such social synchronization and the underlying evolutionary and ecological drivers that shape them remain poorly understood 5–7,9 . Here, we address this in the context of biparental care, a particularly sensitive phase of social synchronization 12 where pair members potentially compromise their individual rhythms. Using data from 729 nests of 91 populations of 32 biparentally-incubating shorebird species, where parents synchronize to achieve continuous coverage of developing eggs, we report remarkable within– and between-species diversity in incubation rhythms. Between species, the median length of one parent’s incubation bout varied from 1 – 19 hours, while period length–the time in which a parent’s probability to incubate cycles once between its highest and lowest value – varied from 6 – 43 hours. The length of incubation bouts was unrelated to variables reflecting energetic demands, but species relying on crypsis (the ability to avoid detection by other animals) had longer incubation bouts than those that are readily visible or actively protect their nest against predators. Rhythms entrainable to the 24-h light-dark cycle were less prevalent at high latitudes and absent in 18 species. Our results indicate that even under similar environmental conditions and despite 24-h environmental cues, social synchronization can generate far more diverse behavioural rhythms than expected from studies of individuals in captivity 5–7,9 . The risk of predation, not the risk of starvation, may be a key factor underlying the diversity in these rhythms.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Nature, 540 (7631), 109.
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- When the sun never sets: diverse activity rhythms under continuous daylight in free-living arctic-breeding birdsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2013
- Geolocation by light: accuracy and precision affected by environmental factorsMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012
- Do Uniparental Sanderlings Calidris alba Increase Egg Heat Input to Compensate for Low Nest Attentiveness?PLOS ONE, 2011
- Breeding latitude drives individual schedules in a trans-hemispheric migrant birdNature Communications, 2010
- Heritable circadian period length in a wild bird populationProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphismProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic NetJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2005
- Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific DataThe American Naturalist, 1997
- LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY AND NON‐PHOTIC INFLUENCES ON CIRCADIAN CLOCKSBiological Reviews, 1996
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985