Workplace sabotage: its styles, motives and management
Author:
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Management Development
- Vol. 14 (7) , 48-65
Abstract
Argues that there is a dark side to organizations which is difficult to observe, yet it gives rise to the most spectacular, destructive, least manageable, unconventional forms of behaviour. Despite its common occurrence, workplace sabotage has hitherto remained relatively unknown and little understood. Because of its often covert and taboo characteristics, sabotage has not been the subject of a thorough investigation. A six‐year long empirical study of unconventional behaviours, through participant observation in industry has shed light on these practices, including sabotage. Identifies the main dimensions of these unconventional practices, their dominant styles and the meanings and motives for their occurrences. Since the decision to resort to sabotage to express discontent is primarily a response to the prevailing managerial philosophy and practices, asserts here that effective supervision, increased communication and proper motivation will minimize the occurrence of these practices at work. Concludes by making practical recommendations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Industrial Conflict and Its ExpressionsLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 1992
- UNCONVENTIONAL PRACTICES AT WORK: INSIGHT AND ANALYSIS THROUGH PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONJournal of Managerial Psychology, 1992
- Managerial Skills for Senior ManagersInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 1990
- Defiance at WorkEmployee Relations: The International Journal, 1989
- Strikes1989
- STRIKES AND UNORGANISED CONFLICT: SOME FURTHER CONSIDERATIONSBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1979
- Discovery of Substantive Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitative ResearchAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1965
- Participant Observation and Interviewing: A ComparisonHuman Organization, 1957
- Industrial Conflict and Its MediationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1954
- Restriction of Output and Social Cleavage in IndustryHuman Organization, 1946