SACRAL NEUROMODULATION IN THE TREATMENT OF URGENCY-FREQUENCY SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY ON EFFICACY AND SAFETY
Authors:
- Steven W. SiegelSSSteven W. Siegel
- A.A.B. Lycklama ÀnÿeholtAÀA.A.B. Lycklama Ànÿeholt
- Mostafa M. ElhilaliMEMostafa M. Elhilali
- Philip E.V. van KerrebroeckPKPhilip E.V. van Kerrebroeck
- Anurag K. DASADAnurag K. DAS
- Jerzy B. GajewskiJGJerzy B. Gajewski
- Rudi A. JanknegtRJRudi A. Janknegt
- David A. RivasDRDavid A. Rivas
- Hero DijkemaHDHero Dijkema
- Douglas F. MilamDMDouglas F. Milam
- Kimberly A. OlesonKOKimberly A. Oleson
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 163 (6) , 1849-1854
Abstract
Neuromodulation of sacral nerves has shown promising results in correcting voiding dysfunction. We report the results of a multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy of sacral nerve neuromodulation in patients presenting with refractory urinary urgency-frequency. A total of 51 patients from 12 centers underwent baseline assessment, including a detailed voiding diary, urodynamic evaluation and percutaneous test stimulation of the sacral nerves at S3 and/or S4. All patients enrolled in the study had undergone prior conventional treatment, such as pharmacotherapy, hydrodistention and surgical intervention, which failed. All patients demonstrated a satisfactory response to trial stimulation and were randomly divided into a stimulation group (25 patients) and a control group (26). A sacral nerve stimulation device was implanted after 6 months in the control group. Patients were followed at 1, 3 and 6 months, and at 6-month intervals for up to 2 years after implantation of a neuroprosthetic InterStim* system. dagger The study variables included the number of voids daily, volume voided per void and degree of urgency before void. Compared to the control group, 6-month voiding diary results demonstrated statistically significant improvements (p <0.0001) in the stimulation group with respect to the number voids daily (16.9 +/- 9.7 to 9.3 +/- 5.1), volume per void (118 +/- 74 to 226 +/- 124 ml.) and degree of urgency (rank 2.2 +/- 0.6 to 1.6 +/- 0.9). Patients in the control group showed no significant changes in voiding parameters at 6 months. Significant improvements in favor of the stimulation group were noted in various parameters with respect to water cystometry and quality of life (SF-36). At 6 months after implant, neurostimulators were turned off in the stimulation group and urinary symptoms returned to baseline values. After reactivation of stimulation sustained efficacy was documented at 12 and 24 months. Neuromodulation of the sacral nerves is an effective, safe therapy that successfully treats significant symptoms of refractory urgency-frequency.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY URINARY URGE INCONTINENCEJournal of Urology, 1999
- Interstitial cystitis: Unexplained associations with other chronic disease and pain syndromesUrology, 1997
- Epidemiology of interstitial cystitisUrology, 1997
- Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Patients With GastroparesisJournal of Urology, 1997
- Sacral (S3) Segmental Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Urge Incontinence in Patients with Detrusor Instability: Results of Chronic Electrical Stimulation using an Implantable Neural ProsthesisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Bowel dysfunction in young women with urinary retention.Gut, 1993
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1993
- Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status InstrumentsMedical Care, 1992
- Using Health Status Measures in the Hospital SettingMedical Care, 1992
- Neural Stimulation for Control of Voiding Dysfunction: A Preliminary Report in 22 Patients with Serious Neuropathic Voiding DisordersJournal of Urology, 1989