Variable Streamflow Response to Forest Disturbance in the Western US: A Large‐Sample Hydrology Approach
- 13 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 58 (6)
Abstract
Forest cover and streamflow are generally expected to vary inversely because reduced forest cover typically leads to less transpiration and interception. However, recent studies in the western U.S. have found no change or even decreased streamflow following forest disturbance due to drought and insect epidemics. We investigated streamflow response to forest cover change using hydrologic, climatic, and forest data for 159 watersheds in the western U.S. from the CAMELS data set for the period 2000–2019. Forest change and disturbance were quantified in terms of net tree growth (total growth volume minus mortality volume) and mean annual mortality rates, respectively, from the U.S. Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis database. Annual streamflow was analyzed using multiple methods: Mann‐Kendall trend analysis, time trend analysis to quantify change not attributable to annual precipitation and temperature, and multiple regression to quantify contributions of climate, mortality, and aridity. Many watersheds exhibited decreased annual streamflow even as forest cover decreased. Time trend analysis identified decreased streamflow not attributable to precipitation and temperature changes in many disturbed watersheds, yet streamflow change was not consistently related to disturbance, suggesting drivers other than disturbance, precipitation, and temperature. Multiple regression analysis indicated that although change in streamflow is significantly related to tree mortality, the direction of this effect depends on aridity. Specifically, forest disturbances in wet, energy‐limited watersheds (i.e., where annual potential evapotranspiration [PET] is less than annual precipitation) tended to increase streamflow, while post‐disturbance streamflow more frequently decreased in dry water‐limited watersheds (where the PET to precipitation ratio exceeds 2.35).Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summertime climate response to mountain pine beetle disturbance in British ColumbiaNature Geoscience, 2012
- Ecohydrological consequences of drought‐ and infestation‐ triggered tree die‐off: insights and hypothesesEcohydrology, 2011
- Evaluation of methods for estimating the effects of vegetation change and climate variability on streamflowWater Resources Research, 2010
- Plotting partial correlation and regression in ecological studiesWeb Ecology, 2008
- A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetationJournal of Hydrology, 2005
- A COMPARISON OF SIX POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS FOR REGIONAL USE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATESJawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2005
- Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debateJournal of Hydrology, 2004
- Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forestJournal of Hydrology, 1987
- THE POTENTIAL FOR WATER YIELD AUGMENTATION FROM FOREST MANAGEMENT IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1983
- A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspirationJournal of Hydrology, 1982