Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces
Authors:
Open Access
- 25 February 2017
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1914-1933
Abstract
Online freelancing marketplaces have grown quickly in recent years. In theory, these sites offer workers the ability to earn money without the obligations and potential social biases associated with traditional employment frameworks. In this paper, we study whether two prominent online freelance marketplaces - TaskRabbit and Fiverr - are impacted by racial and gender bias. From these two platforms, we collect 13,500 worker profiles and gather information about workers' gender, race, customer reviews, ratings, and positions in search rankings. In both marketplaces, we find evidence of bias: we find that gender and race are significantly correlated with worker evaluations, which could harm the employment opportunities afforded to the workers. We hope that our study fuels more research on the presence and implications of discrimination in online environments.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swiss National Science Foundation (CR21I1_146499 / 1)
- National Science Foundation (CHS-1408345 and CHS-1553088)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace2016
- Peeking Beneath the Hood of Uber2015
- Race effects on eBayThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2015
- Engineering Trust: Reciprocity in the Production of Reputation InformationManagement Science, 2013
- Sex, Society, and Association: A Cross-national Examination of Status Construction TheorySocial Psychology Quarterly, 2008
- Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labor market using experimental dataLabour Economics, 2007
- Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market DiscriminationAmerican Economic Review, 2004
- Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market1999
- Expectation States and Interracial Interaction in School SettingsAnnual Review of Sociology, 1982
- Status Organizing ProcessesAnnual Review of Sociology, 1980