Routine Sperm Cryopreservation Before Vasectomy Is not Cost-effective and Does not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal

This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:

• The Diversity of Vasectomy Reversal Providers and Their Web-based Advertising Habits in the United States
  Urology, 2023
• Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: a contemporary, comparative analysis
  Fertility and Sterility, 2021
• Patient Factors Influencing Decision to Undergo Vasectomy Reversal
  Urology Practice, 2019
• Fertility preservation for men with testicular cancer: Is sperm cryopreservation cost effective in the era of assisted reproductive technology?
  Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2018
• Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  Fertility and Sterility, 2015
• Association Between the Presence of Sperm in the Vasal Fluid During Vasectomy Reversal and Postoperative Patency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  Urology, 2015
• Racial Differences in Vasectomy Utilization in the United States: Data From the National Survey of Family Growth
  Urology, 2009
• Postoperative pain, complications, and satisfaction rates in patients who undergo surgical sperm retrieval
  Fertility and Sterility, 2003
• Semen storage for special purposes at Monash IVF from 1977 to 1997
  Fertility and Sterility, 1999
• PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH VASECTOMY REVERSAL
  Journal of Urology, 1999